Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFMCoC - HEAP Annual Report Through September 30 2020HEAP Annual Report through September 30, 2020 Please select your jurisdiction type. Please select from the list of Continuums of Care Jurisdiction Selection Name Phone Email Introduction CoC Fresno City & County Madera County CoC Please provide contact information below for an individual who can answer questions about the details in this report. Dylan McCully (559) 600-2341 dmccully@fresnocountyca.gov Has the selected jurisdiction served any people with HEAP funds through September 30, 2020? Emergency Shelter Emergency Shelter APR Transitional Housing Transitional Housing APR Street Outreach Services Only Services Only APR Safe Haven Day Shelter Homelessness Prevention PH - Housing Only PH - Permanent Supportive Housing (disability required for entry) Performance Metrics Yes APR CoC_Fresno Cit… 26.74 KB  APR CoC_Fresno Cit… 26.16 KB  Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected APR CoC_Fresno Cit… 26.50 KB  Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected PH - Housing with Services (no disability required for entry) PH - Rapid Re-Housing PH - Rapid Re-Housing APR Other All Projects APR Supplemental Performance Metrics To what extent are your jurisdictions HEAP projects entered into HMIS? Total HEAP Funds Obligated Total HEAP Funds Expended Total Interest Accrued from HEAP Funds Total Interest Accrued Expended Reported Totals: Total Obligations and Expenditures Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected APR CoC_Fresno Cit… 25.63 KB  Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No Data Collected CoC_Fresno Cit… 27.63 KB CoC_Fresno Cit… 44.82 KB  All projects are entered into HMIS $9,026,296.00 $3,902,529.91 $239,783.32 $0.00 Total Administrative Total Capital Improvements Total Services Total Rental Assistance and/or Subsidies Total Youth Set-Aside Total Other If your jurisdiction has any planned expenditures in the 'other' category, please provide a description and amount budgeted for each type of 'other' expenditure. Calculated Total Funds Expended Reported Total Funds Expended Spending By Category In the following section, please report your jurisdiction's total categorical expenditures for its HEAP Funding through September 30, 2020. Reminder: this should be cumulative (i.e. from the grant start date through September 30, 2020). Enter "0.00" if you did not spend any funds in a given category. The sum of all categories should equal the amount entered for your jurisdiction's HEAP funds expended. In the prior section you indicated this amount was$3,902,529.91 $241,229.19 $0.00 $532,966.46 $418,025.59 $197,888.54 $2,512,420.13 Although HEAP funding is utilized to provide new services across the Continuum, no HEAP funds were used to purchase, build, or renovate the locations used for these services. As such, Navigation (Triage) Center, Transitional (Bridge) Housing, and Youth Transitional (Bridge) Housing services were not budgeted under "Capital Improvements" and are not listed under "Capital Improvements" in this report. Instead they are listed under "Other Projects." Budgeted amounts for these expenditures are as follows: Navigation (Triage) Center services: $4,128,125.00 Transitional (Bridge) Housing services: $1,271,875 $3,902,529.91 $3,902,529.91 Total Capital Improvements from Youth Set-Aside Total Services from Youth Set-Aside Total Rental Assistance and/or Subsidies from Youth Set-Aside Total Other from Youth Set-Aside If your jurisdiction has any planned expenditures in the 'other' category, please provide a description and amount budgeted for each type of 'other' expenditure. Calculated Total Youth Funds Expended Reported Total Youth Funds Expended Youth Set-Aside Detail Reported Total Interest Accrued Expended Interest Expended Detail $0.00 $43,077.42 $20,212.36 $134,598.76 Although HEAP funding is utilized to provide new services across the Continuum, no HEAP funds were used to purchase, build, or renovate the locations used for these services. As such, Youth Transitional (Bridge) Housing services were not budgeted under "Capital Improvements" and are not listed under "Capital Improvements" in this report. Instead they are listed under "Other Projects." The budgeted amount for Youth Transitional (Bridge) Housing services is $327,884.00. $197,888.54 $197,888.54 $0.00 Completed Project Narratives Template Project Narratives Project Narrative updates provide critical data on what each jurisdiction is funding with HEAP dollars. To complete this section, please download and fill out the Project Narratives Template. List every project funded through HEAP including those that have spent all their funding, those in the process of spending their funding, and planned projects that have not yet spent funding. For each project provide: 1.Organization - the entity carrying out the project 2.Project Title - how your team refers to the project and/or how it is referenced in HMIS 3.HEAP Eligible Use Category 4.Project Description - describe the project's core activities, goals, and/or scope. 5.Total Budget- total project funding provided through HEAP 6.Spending through September 30, 2020 7.Project End Date 8.Do you plan to continue funding this project with HHAP? (Yes/No/Unsure) 9.Additional Notes or explanation (optional) Reminder: If your jurisdiction submitted •a "one-pager" as part of last year's HEAP Annual Report OR •a project update as part of a spending and mitigation plan in the last 6 months we strongly recommend you leverage this information when filling out the Project Narratives Template. You may simply copy/paste from the previous submission and then update where necessary. If you need a copy of the previously submitted document, please email: hcfc@bcsh.ca.gov Project Narratives Template.xlsx 21.85 KB  Has your jurisdiction implemented any racial equity strategies for how you mitigate and solve homelessness in your community? If so, please describe in detail the most effective effort(s) you have undertaken. If your jurisdiction has not implemented any racial equity strategies for addressing homelessness, state N/A. Racial Equity Review How have you partnered with a new local level provider using HEAP funds? Please share at least one successful collaboration in detail and what made it successful. If you did not partner with any new local level providers, state N/A. How did you partner differently with your neighboring cities, CoCs and/or Counties as result of receiving HEAP funding? Please share at least one successful collaboration in detail and what made it successful. If you did not partner with any neighboring jurisdictions, state N/A. Partnership Review The Fresno Madera Continuum of Care plans to implement the following strategies to address racial equity in its effort to mitigate and solve homelessness in the community: 1. Conduct a staff survey to determine how many people in each job category identify with each racial or ethnic group, and take affirmative steps in its hiring practices to shore up any deficiencies and ensure that people from a wide variety of racial and ethnic backgrounds will be able to identify with and feel comfortable with their service providers; 2. Host a community-wide training on cultural competence so that staff will be better able to serve people of different races and ethnic backgrounds using the best available approach; 3. Collect statistics from HMIS on placements into permanent housing programs and on housing move-in dates and follow up on any statistical patterns by interviewing staff on additional barriers to housing that are most frequently experienced by clients of color. The CoC has developed a new partnership with a local provider, Selma Community Outreach Ministries (Selma COM), through a subcontract of the HEAP funded Home Sweet Home Rapid Rehousing agreement with WestCare California, which has helped to build capacity among the local homeless service providers. The partnership with Selma COM has also helped to provide rapid rehousing services, including connections to permanent housing, for households experiencing homelessness in the often-underserved rural community in East Fresno County. Selma COM’s knowledge of local resources and willingness to learn as well as WestCare’s ability to provide infrastructure and mentoring to Selma COM both contributed to the success of this program. An ad hoc committee consisting of 13 regional partners, including the CoC, County of Fresno, and City of Fresno, developed a spending plan for HEAP grant funding to address the existing gaps in community’s homeless response system. Although the CoC did not partner directly with the City of Fresno in providing HEAP funded services, both jurisdictions aligned services and program goals for the new Navigation Center programs funded by their respective HEAP allocations to ensure a consistency of service delivery across all programs. Through these efforts, all entities acknowledged a need for working together to strategize spending and service-delivery across the continuum. As a result, the funding and service plans for HHAP funding have been increasingly integrated with joint planning budgets and entities providing continued funding to keep a program running beyond the availability of the original funding. There is now an increased awareness of programs across the continuum and an improved focus on the continuum as a whole, rather than each entities’ individual programs. Please provide any additional comments Name Title Certification I certify that all information included in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Laura Moreno Program Manager