HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty of Fresno - HHAP Annual Report Through September 30 2020HHAP Annual Report through September 30,
2020
Please select your jurisdiction type.
Please select from the list of Counties
Jurisdiction Selection
Name
Phone Email
Introduction
County
Fresno
Please provide contact information below for an individual who can answer questions about the details in this
report.
Dylan McCully
(559) 600-2341 dmccully@fresnocountyca.gov
Has the selected jurisdiction served any people with HHAP funds through September 30, 2020?
Emergency Shelter
Transitional Housing
Street Outreach
Services Only
Safe Haven
Day Shelter
Homelessness Prevention
PH - Housing Only
PH - Permanent Supportive Housing (disability
required for entry)
PH - Housing with Services (no disability
required for entry)
Performance Metrics
Yes
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Manual Reporting Form
This will be included in the
Manual Reporting Form
upload at the bottom of
this page
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
PH - Rapid Re-Housing
Other
Manual Reporting Form
Total HHAP Funds Obligated Total HHAP Funds Expended
Total Obligations and Expenditures
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
Not Funded OR No Persons Served OR No
Data Collected
County_Fresno_…
215.84 KB
$500,000.00 $25,061.38
Please select all of the project types for which your jurisdiction obligated or expended HHAP funds
Emergency Shelter Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
Transitional Housing Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
Street Outreach Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
Homelessness Prevention Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
PH - Rapid Re-Housing Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
Planned Expenditures
Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing Street Outreach Homelessness Prevention
PH - Rapid Re-Housing
Operating Subsidies $631,496.88 $0.00 $0.00
Total:
$631,496.88
Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00
Operating Subsidies $422,582.52 $0.00 $0.00
Total:
$422,582.52
Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00
Outreach and Coordination $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $25,061.38
Total:
$500,000.00
Total:
$500,000.00
Total: $25,061.38
Prevention and Diversion $297,723.92 $0.00 $0.00
Total:
$297,723.92
Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00
Rental assistance and rapid rehousing $311,042.22 $0.00 $0.00
Total:
$311,042.22
Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00
Please select all of the following eligible uses for which your jurisdiction has budgeted, obligated, or expended HHAP
funding
Total Budgeted for Administrative
Costs
Total Obligated for Administrative
Costs
Total Expended for Administrative
Costs
Please describe the activities budgeted or funded for administrative costs
Calculated Total Funds Budgeted Calculated Total Funds Obligated Calculated Total Funds Expended
Reported Total Funds Obligated Reported Total Funds Expended
Please report the amounts budgeted, obligated, and expended for strategic homelessness planning, infrastructure
development to support CES and HMIS, and/or grant administration.
Select all of the eligible uses that were funded with HHAP dollars, enter the amounts budgeted, obligated, and
expended for that each eligible use, and provide a brief description of the activities funded by each eligible use.
Enter "0.00" if you did not budget, obligate, or spend any funds in a given category. If you did not budget or fund
any of these eligible uses, you can proceed to the next page.
Please note that a grantee may expend no more than 5 percent of its allocation on strategic homelessness
planning and infrastructure development and no more than 7 percent of its allocation on administrative costs.
Administrative costs
$162,794.82 $0.00 $0.00
Administrative costs include staff time to administer the HHAP allocation and conduct monitoring and oversight of
HHAP-funded projects.
$2,325,640.36 $500,000.00 $25,061.38
$500,000.00 $25,061.38
Does your jurisdiction know what specific youth projects will be funded with the HHAP youth set-aside?
Please describe your HHAP youth set-aside project plans
Total Youth Funds Budgeted Total Youth Funds Obligated Total Youth Funds Expended
Please select all of the project types for which your jurisdiction budgeted or expended HHAP youth set-aside funds
Transitional Housing Projects
Eligible Uses Funded Total Budgeted Total Obligated Total Expended
Calculated Total Youth Funds
Budgeted
Calculated Total Youth Funds
Obligated
Calculated Total Youth Funds
Expended
Youth Set-Aside Detail
Yes
The County plans to extend the existing HEAP-funded Bridge Housing program that serves as short-term housing
when a youth household (ages 18 – 24) is unsheltered or has been offered a permanent housing intervention but
the permanent housing opportunity is still being arranged. The goal of the program is to ensure: 1) those preparing
to enter into permanent housing are housed and easily located, receiving the necessary services to access
permanent housing in a timely manner and 2) youth who are unsheltered and not appropriate for the adult triage
center have an emergency bed available. Services are housing-focused and highly integrated with both the
permanent housing provider and the participant’s Navigator. Services also include health and safety education.
$186,051.23 $0.00 $0.00
Transitional Housing
Operating Subsidies $186,051.23 $0.00 $0.00
Total:
$186,051.23
Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00
$186,051.23 $0.00 $0.00
Please describe the ways in which you are determining the disproportionate impacts that homelessness has on
communities of color, particularly Black, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native and Indigenous communities. Please
reference any data and data source that you use to analyze this information.
How are the voices of Black, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native and Indigenous communities and those with lived
experience of homelessness being centered in a meaningful, sustained way in creating effective approaches to reducing
and ending homelessness? How are they involved in the funding decision-making process?
How has the HHAP project funding process included prioritization for programs that are addressing the
disproportionate impacts that homelessness and COVID-19 has on communities of color, particularly Black, Latinx,
Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native and Indigenous communities?
Racial Equity Review
The County of Fresno, along with the CoC, is currently analyzing the disparities occurring in the community and
developing a plan to address findings. The following data sources are being utilized in this effort:
• The HUD CoC Racial Equity Analysis tool, and by extension the 2017 Point-in-Time Count and the 2010-2015
American Community Survey (ACS).
• Stella Tools
• 2019 Point-in-Time Count
• Case Study of Village of Hope Project – Racial Disparity Assessment
The County of Frenso, along with the CoC, is analyzing the disparities occurring in the community and developing
a plan to address findings and create meaningful input into the procurement and funding processes.
The HHAP project funding was implemented in alignment with the HEAP grant procurement process, which did not
include prioritization for programs that address the disproportionate impacts of homelessness and COVID-19 has
on communities of color. The County of Fresno, in coordination with the CoC, plans to proactively prioritize
agencies and programs that will serve underserved and marginalized communities through the upcoming
procurement process for HHAP Round 2 funds and other funding sources.
How have you partnered differently with your neighboring cities, CoCs and/or Counties as result of receiving HHAP
funding? Please share at least one successful collaboration in detail and what made it successful.
Please describe any barriers to partnering you have experienced since receiving your HHAP allocation. Please explain
why this has been a barrier and how it could be resolved.
Have you developed any new local level partnerships as a result of planning for HHAP funded projects? What have the
outcomes been of these newly developed partnerships? In this case, partnership is broadly defined and not restricted
to those with whom you have contracted.
Partnership Review
Please provide any additional comments
Name
Title
The budget and service plans for HHAP funding have been increasingly integrated with joint planning for both
funding and service coordination. One example is the collaboration between the City, County, and CoC whereby
funding from the City will be used to pick up where the CoC and County funding is depleted to enable the City to
continue providing the 50-bed Navigation Center program with Mental Health Systems, Inc. in Fresno, CA for an
additional 24 months.
As with much of the funding coming from various sources to the local level, funding awarded to multiple entities is
subject to the administrative requirements and priorities or each entity. This can make it challenging to align
services across the community. Communication is also a challenge due to the number of individuals involved at the
planning and administrative level. The resolutions require entities to come together to identify the needs of the
community and gaps in meeting those needs, for each entity to communicate a clear direction for addressing the
gaps, and for each entity to do its part in advocating for a common solution for the entire continuum.
Having identified a funding need to support ongoing outreach services in the rural areas, the County Department of
Social Services has partnered with the Department of Behavioral Health to continue providing rural services in their
existing outreach agreement with a local provider. This partnership has enabled the program to serve 61
individuals in the rural areas in the first quarter, with 2 exits to permanent housing and 18 exits to a safe temporary
housing destination.
Certification
I certify that all information included in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Laura Moreno
Program Manager