HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRAFT 2020 FMCoC New Scoring Tool FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 1
1. THRESHOLD FACTORS
Name Description Scoring
Housing First The project will commit to running a low-barrier, Housing First
program. Pass / Fail
Coordinated
Entry The project will participate in coordinated entry. Pass / Fail
HMIS The project will enter data for all CoC-funded beds into HMIS (or
parallel database for domestic violence services). Pass / Fail
Equal Access The project will provide equal access and fair housing without regard
to sexual orientation, gender identity, or local residency status. Pass / Fail
Formerly
Homeless Input
The agency will engage homeless and formerly homeless clients in
program design and policy making by including them on its board of
directors or staff, by having a consumer advisory board that meets
regularly, by administering consumer satisfaction surveys, and/or by
convening client focus groups.
Pass / Fail
Eligible Clients
The project will only accept new participants if they can be
documented as eligible for this project’s program type based on their
housing and disability status.
Pass / Fail
Eligible
Applicant Neither the applicant nor any sub-recipients are for-profit entities. Pass / Fail
Match Agency will be able to provide 25% match per grant. Pass / Fail
Budget Project has made a good faith effort to complete the budget template
provided, showing CoC and non-CoC funding sources for the project. Pass / Fail
Connection to
Mainstream
Resources
Project has a specific plan to coordinate and integrate with other
mainstream health, social services, and employment programs and
ensure that program participants are assisted to obtain benefits. If
the agency has any current clients, the plan must mention the
percentage of current clients who have obtained at least one
mainstream benefit while enrolled in the agency’s program(s).
Pass / Fail
FMCoC
Membership The agency is a member in good standing of the FMCoC. Pass /
Must Fix
DV Only:
Trauma-
Informed
Housing projects that are applying for DV Bonus funding must
demonstrate that they use trauma-informed, victim-centered
approaches.
Pass / Fail /
Inapplicable
Required but not assigned a point value
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 2
2. COMPLIANCE (20 pts.)
Name SPMs Description Score
Audit and/or
Monitoring
Findings
3.1
3.2
Projects were instructed to submit a copy of their agency’s most
recent audit report or monitoring report. Any type of report can be
used – the audit could be from HUD, from a direct recipient, from an
accountant, etc. The report could be for the entire agency, or for a
project that is similar in type and/or population to the new project
being proposed. The report should be dated no earlier than
1/1/2018.
Award the full 8 points if
• The project attaches a recent report with no significant
negative findings.
Award up to 5 points if:
• The project did not attach a recent report, but the project
convincingly explains why it was not monitored or audited
since 1/1/2018.
• The project attached a report with negative findings, but the
project convincingly explains how it has corrected the
negative findings.
Otherwise, award 0 points.
Up to
8
points
Experience
with Federal
and/or State
Grants
2
Award up to 4 points if the agency has…
• Successfully drawn down at least 95% of funding from a
grant of at least $250,000
• Prepared detailed eligibility documentation to a funder that
shows what assistance each client received and why that
client was qualified to receive that assistance.
Up to
4
points
Participation
in CoC
Activities
2
Award points for the agency’s participation and leadership at CoC
events, meetings, committees, forums, and projects, with a focus on
activities that took place since the last NOFA. This does not include
attendance at General Membership meetings. Typically, each point
will require about 4 hours of effort, so full credit should be awarded
if the agency has provided 16 hours of attendance/involvement.
Up to
4
points
HMIS 5.1
5.2
Award points based on project’s plan for maintaining accurate &
timely data, and/or based on agency’s history of high data quality.
Up to
2
points
Coordinated
Entry
1.1
1.2
Award points based on project’s plan for communicating open beds
to CES, participating in case conferences, attending CES workgroups,
and using referrals from CES to fill openings.
Up to
2
points
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 3
3. HOUSING DESIGN (24 pts.)
Name SPMs Description Score
Project
Access to
Housing
7b.1
7b.2
Award the full 12 points if:
• the agency already has a deed, master lease, or binding
option for a specific property that will accommodate all of
the program’s clients, or
• The agency will employ its own housing navigators who have
special skill or experience in finding housing, and has
attached a job description or resume for the housing
navigator position, or
• The agency has already secured its own non-HUD funds that
it will use to offer significant and appropriate financial
incentives to landlords. Merely referencing the funds
available through Coordinated Entry does not qualify for full
credit.
Award up to 6 points if:
• the agency offers another credible explanation for how it will
obtain control of its housing site and/or find housing for
clients, and
• the agency has a demonstrated track record of housing
clients successfully.
Otherwise, award 0 points.
Up to
12
points
Housing
Meets
Client
Needs
7b.1
7b.2
Award points if the project adequately explains why its homes:
• will have a layout, location, and/or features that are
thoughtfully matched to the target population
• will be accessible to people with disabilities
• will provide rare or unique options, e.g., pet-friendly housing,
or housing with parking spots, or housing with elevators.
Up to 6
points
Housing
Quality
Standards
2
Award points if the project adequately explains:
• Who will inspect client housing
• When the housing will be inspected, and
• How the project will respond when housing fails to meet
minimum quality standards
Up to 3
points
Projected
Outcomes
4
7b.1
7b.2
Award points if the project set suitably challenging, measurable goals
that meet minimum CoC-adopted targets, including:
• > 85% of clients will experience positive housing outcomes
• > 55% of adults will maintain or increase total income
Up to 3
points
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 4
4. SERVICES DESIGN (17 pts.)
Name SPMs Description Score
Stabilize
Clients in
Housing
7b.1
7b.2
Award points if the project adequately explains how its services
will help clients stabilize in permanent housing.
Up to 5
points
Enroll Clients
in Benefits
4.2
4.5
Award points if the project adequately explains how its services
will individually assist each client to obtain the benefits of
mainstream health, social, and employment programs for which
they are eligible to apply.
Up to 3
points
Project
Staffing 4
Award points if staff is:
• Large enough to handle the expected client case load;
• Trained in innovative or evidence-based practices; and
• Trained to meet the needs of the population to be served
Up to 3
points
Community
Coordination 4
Award points if the project provides details about how they have
specific partnerships with other agencies to refer their clients for
specific outside services.
Do not award points for a general statement that the project is
well-connected in the community.
Up to 3
points
Improve
Safety for DV
Survivors
Award points based on the extent to which the project will
improve safety for survivors of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or trafficking.
Up to 3
points
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 5
5. FULL UTILIZATION (24 pts.)
Name SPMs Description Score
Budget 3.1
3.2
Award points based on the following factors:
• The budget provides information on how both HUD
funding and match funding will be spent.
• The budget is unambiguous and easy to read.
• The budget does not attempt to use HUD funding on
ineligible expenses.
• The budget has a reasonable size compared to the
number of people to be served.
• The amount of money in each portion of the budget is
reasonable given the project’s design.
Up to 10
points
Fiscal
Capacity
3.1
3.2
Award points if the agency has sufficient fiscal capacity to
manage the grant, including:
• internal financial controls
• grant match tracking
• well-maintained records
• oversight by a board of directors
• a strategy for documenting eligible costs
• a strategy for ensuring adequate grant drawdowns
Up to 6
points
Ready to
Start
3.1
3.2
Award points if the project will be ready to begin housing clients
within 3 months of receiving HUD funding. Consider:
• Whether the agency has already served the same
subpopulation with similar service types.
• Whether the project site faces regulatory obstacles such
as tenant displacement, environmental issues, or zoning
issues;
• Whether the agency’s current staff has the capacity to
begin preparing for this project;
• Whether the agency already has policies and procedures
that can be used as-is or easily adapted for use in a CoC-
funded project
Up to 8
points
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 6
6. STANDARD PRIORITIZATION (15 pts.)
Name SPMs Description Score
Housing
First 2
Award up to 5 points based on the project’s narrative if the
narrative shows that the project:
• Will check all “Housing First” boxes in e-snaps
• Admits new clients without barriers based on income,
sobriety, criminal records, or mental health
• Does not require clients to participate in mandatory classes,
therapy, job training, or interventions.
• Does not impose restrictions on clients that go beyond
what is typically covered in an ordinary lease agreement
• Is able to address disruptive client behavior without exiting
or evicting those clients
The Panel has discretion to adjust this score up or down based on
an optional review of the project’s policies and procedures.
Up to 5
points
Special
Populations
1.1
1.2
Award up to 4 points if the project targets one or more of the
following specialized populations:
(a) Homeless Youth,
(b) Domestic Violence survivors,
(c) Homeless Families with Children,
(d) Chronic Homeless, and/or
(e) Homeless Veterans
In order to earn credit for this factor based on serving the
Chronically Homeless population, a PSH project must check the box
for DedicatedPLUS or 100% Dedicated in e-SNAPs.
Up to 4
points
Severity of
Needs
1.1
1.2
Award up to 4 points based on the project’s plan to meet specific
needs and vulnerabilities, including: low or no income, current or
past substance use, a history of victimization such as domestic
violence or sexual assault, criminal histories, and/or chronic
homelessness.
Up to 4
points
Fair Housing 1.1
1.2
Award up to 2 points if the project affirmatively markets housing
and supportive services to eligible persons regardless of race, color,
national origin, limited English proficiency, religion, sex, gender
identity, sexual orientation, age, familial status, and/or disability.
This means going beyond mere non-discrimination and taking
positive steps to welcome those who would otherwise be least
likely to apply.
Up to 2
points
FRESNO-MADERA CONTINUUM OF CARE
2020 DRAFT NEW PROJECT SCORING TOOL (SIMPLIFIED)
Approved by the Fresno-Madera Continuum of Care on xxx, 2020. 7
6b. PRIORITIZATION FOR DV BONUS HOUSING (15 pts.)
*Use this section instead of the previous page if the project will be dedicated to serving victims
of domestic violence. For all scoring purposes, “domestic violence” also includes dating
violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or trafficking.
Name Description Source Score
Summary of
Local Needs
Award points if the project adequately summarizes all four of
the following:
• A description of the local need for DV-related housing
and services, e.g., how many people need support;
• The local resources for DV-related housing and
services, e.g., what services are already offered;
• A quantitative estimate of the size of the gap between
local resources and local need;
• A quantitative estimate of how the proposed project
will reduce that gap.
RFI Up to 4
points
Trauma-
Informed,
Victim-
Centered
Approaches
As a threshold factor, all DV Bonus housing projects must
explain how the services that will be offered are trauma-
informed and victim-centered. To earn additional points,
projects should include a description of how the project’s
services will differ from ordinary supportive services for the
general homeless population, and an estimate of the number
of hours and/or the level of training that the program’s staff
have received in delivering trauma-informed, victim-centered
services.
RFI Up to 3
points
Previous
Performance
Award points based on the previous performance of the
applicant in serving survivors of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, and/or stalking.
RFI
Up to 3
points
Ability to Meet
Safety
Outcomes
Award points if the project:
• Articulates a specific plan for ensuring that its
residents will be safe from further domestic violence.
• Uses facilities with specialized features that will
enhance the safety of domestic violence survivors.
• Uses staff who have been specially trained in
promoting the safety of domestic violence survivors.
• The project sets quantitative safety targets that are
appropriate and realistic.
• The project explains why it is likely to be able to
achieve the targeted safety outcomes.
RFI Up to 5
points